Main Report Index Page

Restricted

Public Mental Health Practices in Germany

Sterilization and Execution of Patients Suffering from Nervous or Mental Diesase

Reported by

Leo Alexander, Major, M.C., AUS

CIOS Item 24
Medical

Combined Intelligence Objectives Sub-Committee

Part III

(2). Documents concerning expert opinions which Dr. Pfannmüller gave on patients selected for killing in other institutions

These documents included letters of transmittal which accompanied the records which were sent from Professor Dr. Heyde to Dr. Pfannmüller for expert appraisal. Dr. Heyde’s letters of transmittal were written on stationery of the "Reichsasrbeitsgemeinschaft Heil- und Pflegeanstaltern" ("Realm Work Committee of Institutions for Cure and Care") Berlin, "9. Post Office Box 262 - another organization with high-sounding name, whose sole purpose was the killing of mental patients (Appendix 2, No.1). Dr. Pfannmüller returned the records with his expert appraisals by registered mail, accompanied by a letter of transmittal (Appendix 2, No.2) which sometimes contained comments, such as for instance, his comments on a group of 300 cases from the institution for the insane at Gütersloh, in which he sneered at the fact that the patients apparently had not benefited significantly from the results of work therapy which had first been initiated at the institution in Gütersloh (Appendix 2, Nos. 3 and 4). Sometimes Dr. Pfannmüller complained that the clinical abstracts submitted were not good enough to form a satisfactory expert opinion, such as in a group of 200 cases sent from the institutions at Langenhorn and Wiesengrund (Appendix 2 Nos, 5, 6 and 7). In the case of the patients from Langenhorn, however, he gave decisions just the same (Appendix 2, No.6), while in the case of the patients from Wiesengrund, he suggested to have the director submit new clinical abstracts (Appendix 2, No.7). More caustic were his comments concerning clinical abstracts of 300 cases which had been sent from the institution at Hildesheim (Appendix 2, Nos.8 and 9). He suspected the director of that institution of sabotaging the efforts of selection of patients for killing by making exaggerated claims concerning their occupational usefulness. Dr. Pfannmüller suspected that the director’s motives were purely egotistical ones: "he seemed to have heard some rumours about the dissolution of institutions and obviously did not want to help in sawing off the branch of the tree on which he was perched". Dr. Pfannmüller suggested sending an inspecting commission to the institution in Hildesheim to look into the true state of occupational usefulness of the patients.

Altogether Dr. Pfannmüller submitted 5,475 expert appraisals during the period extending from 5 November 1940 to 3 May 1941. Unfortunately only the letters of transmittal and occasional comments are extant, the case histories and clinical abstracts themselves not having been retained in the file.


(3). Documents concerning killing of children at the Heil- und Pflegeanstalt Eglfing-Haar

These activities were initiated by an order of the Ministry of the Interior for the Reich and Prussia, dated 26 June 1940 (Appendix 3, No.1). This order established compulsory registration by midwives, doctors and hospital personnel of all children who were suffering from severe congenital illness such as:-

(I) idiocy and mongolism, especially cases associated with blindness and deafness; (2) microcephaly; (3) hydrocephalus of severe and progressive type; (4) malformations of every type, especially absence of limbs and severe cleft formations of the head or the spine; (5) palsies, including Little’s disease.

Paragraph 4 of this order reads as follows:

"It is contemplated in these cases to carry out treatment of these children with all means of medical science in order to prevent them from lapsing into permanent infirmity. For this purpose, the Realm Committee for scientific approach to severe illness due to heredity and constitution will erect special institutions or special departments in existing institutions".

Shortly after the issue of that order, a meeting of directors of institutions was held at the Ministry of the Interior in Munich, at which the Berlin representative of the committee, who was then a Dr. Wentzler (prior to Dr. von Hegener’s appointment to that position), addressed a select group of directors of institutions and apparently informed them of the true nature of the new type of "intensive treatment". Shortly after the meeting Dr. Pfannmüller sent a letter to Dr. Wentzler, dated 29 June 1940 (Appendix 3, No.2), in which he explained his contemplated participation in the program. The letter reads:

"In the matter of treatment of children with severe congenital illness, which we talked over at your last visit to Munich in joint session at the Ministry of the Interior, we have come to the following conclusion which I am communicating to you on the instructions of the principal expert in this matter, Ministerial Director Dr. Schultze.

"1. After long deliberation we have come to regard it as most suitable if an observation department for children were erected in a special building of my institution".

"2. Before I shall definitely decide to place a building of my institution at disposal for this activity, I regard it as essential to obtain a first-hand impression about the organization involved by a visit to the first institution of this kind of which you spoke, namely the one which had been erected at the ‘Steinhof’ in Vienna. (Steinhof is the State Institution for the Insane in Vienna).

"3. I beg you to authorize me personally to visit this institution in Vienna. The purpose of this visit should be to gain a personal impression of the organizatory and economic integration of this special department, so that I can make suitable arrangements adapted to the local conditions here."

"4. After my visit to the Steinhof in Vienna, I shall submit a report to Ministerial Director Schultze and I would consider it useful if this could be followed by a discussion in Munich between you and ourselves."

"5. In the meantime, the Health Department of the Ministry of the Interior, is making inquiries first of all with the City Health Office in Munich as to how many cases of children with severe congenital illness have already come for registration. The size and space of the building to be put at disposal in my institution will depend upon the results of this inquiry."

"6. The purpose of our future discussion in Munich should be an agreement concerning the economic arrangements with my institution, the number of beds to be arranged for in the special building, the number of personnel to be used, the question which personnel should be used, the food to be supplied and other economic questions. Not until then shall I be in the position to make a rough calculation as to the mode of economic settlement with your organization."

Heil Hitler".

This letter was not initialled, but without doubt is the original carbon copy of Dr. Pfannmüller’s letter. A regulation from the Ministry of the Interior, dated 1.7.1940 (Appendix 3, No.3) regulated that the cost of the program should be defrayed from public welfare funds and in insured cases through sickness insurance.

On 5 August 1940, Dr. Wentzler of the Realm Committee for Scientific Approach to severe illness due to Heredity and Constitution, replied to Dr. Pfannmüller and informed him that arrangements concerning selection of special institutions would soon be completed, at first in Vienna and in Gürden, and probably later in Dr. Pfannmüller’s institution in Munich. Dr. Wentzler suggested that Dr. Pfannmüller get in touch with the directors in Gürden and Vienna at a later date. His letter referred to Dr. Erwin Jekelius as the man in charge in Vienna (Appendix 3, No.4).

There was apparently some delay in organization and it was not until 21 September 1940 that Dr. Pfannmüller reported to Dr. Von Hegener, who had in the meantime taken over in Berlin, that he had selected a Dr. Herbert Jung, who was a member of the Nazi party and politically reliable, as the man in charge of the new department, and stated that he would come to see Dr. von Hegener on 23 September 1940. The letter ends as follows:

"I am glad that positive work in this children’s matter can finally begin at last". (Appendix 3, No.5).

On 11 October 1940 Dr. von Hegener sent Dr. Pfannmüller a special gasoline ration of 30 litres because "in view of the appointment of a new physician you will have to make an increased number of trips to Munich". (Appendix 3, No.6). On 2 November 1940 Dr. Von Hegener asked about a child who was supposed to be admitted to the new department (Appendix 3, No.7) and on 13 November 1940 he sent Dr. Pfannmüller another 30 litres of gasoline coupons "to be used for trips on behalf of the Realm Committee" (Appendix 3, No.8). On 30 November 1930 Dr. Pfannmüller submitted his first report on admissions and discharges to the new department. 11 children were admitted during that months, and 5 had already ‘died’. One child is described as having been taken home by the parents against medical advice: "it was handed to the parents upon their insightless urging. There were no legal means to retain it in the institution by force". (Appendix 3, No.9). On 26 November 1940 Dr. von Hegener invited Dr. Pfannmüller to a special discussion of the "physicians active on behalf of the Realm Committee in Berlin" (Appendix 3, No.10). Dr. Pfannmüller made the following notes about the meeting (Appendix 3, No.11):-

"1. In every case the hereditary situation has to be fully investigated."

"2. Indication for the treatment is determined by the likelihood of permanent unfitness for productive life."

"3. Every case has to be considered on its own merits. For instance, bilateral blindness or bilateral deafness alone, are insufficient indications for the treatment. In meningomyelocele it should be investigated whether palsies are present. Among deformities, only really severest cases with extensive deformities are to be treated, in mongolism, only severest cases which are combined with mental deficiency of a high degree."

"4. In every case one should ask for history of attempted interruptions of pregnancy, and also for severe psychic trauma of the mother during pregnancy".

"5. All cases are to cleared up diagnostically to the last detail. In addition to a complete history, including history of heredity, special examinations such as encephalography, arteriography, X-ray studies and others are to be performed. In mongolism, mere mongoloid habitus should be differentiated from mongoloid idiocy."

"6. Investigations performed hitherto in children with idiocy have shown that idiocy in almost 100% of cases was caused through damage during infancy not caused by heredity. Idiocy in most cases develops pre-natally or intranatally, in some cases even post-natally."

"7. Also the question of heredodegenerative developmental disturbances and diseases are to be cleared up in every case."

On 4 January 1941, Dr. Pfannmüller sent Dr. von Hegener a personal letter in which he expressed how much pleasure he derived from his cooperation with him, and also thanked him for the great help which he had given him by supplying him with extra gas coupons (Appendix 3, No.12). This obviously scrounging letter was followed by an award of 100 litres of gasoline to Dr. Pfannmüller on the part of Dr. von Hegener (Appendix 3, No.13).

On 28 January 1941, Dr. von Hegener sent a letter to Dr. Pfannmüller in which he requested him to name pediatricians and gynaecologists with a National Socialist outlook on life in order to increase the scope of the new activities, presumably to step up the number of referrals (Appendix 3, No.14). In his reply of 8 February 1941 (Appendix 3, No.15), Dr. Pfannmüller stated that he had discussed Dr. von Hegener’s letter with Dr. Walter Schultze, Ministerial Director of the Ministry of the Interior. The letter went on to say

"since I am insufficiently informed about conditions, especially about the political reliability of the clinicians in Munich, I beg you to communicate with Party Comrade Professor Dr. Schultze, who is at the same time Führer of the University teachers, and who could give you a hand in this matter.

Heil Hitler".

Initialled: Pfannmüller ".

On 26 May 1941, Dr. Pfannmüller asked for 50 more beds for the children’s department, because it was overflowing with admissions (Appendix 3, No.16). On the same date Dr. Pfannmüller sent a letter to the Realm Committee in Berlin which indicated that there was some difficulty in obtaining payments from city welfare agencies for children which the Realm Committee referred to the special children’s department for "scientific investigation" and "treatment". (Appendix 3, No.17). At the same time Dr. Pfannmüller informed the juvenile department of the city welfare department of Kempten that the matter would be taken up with the Realm Committee for Scientific Approach to Severe Illness due to Heredity and Constitution (Appendix 3, No.18). Apparently there was some snag about disposing of the children quickly enough, because of the shortage of suitable poison. In his letter of 31 May 1940 (Appendix 3, No.19), addressed to Dr. von Hegener, Dr. Pfannmüller stated

"The 11-year old child, Karl Aigner, has in the meantime been admitted to my institution. It is a case of idiocy of severest kind with great erratic unrest, see-saw movements and outspoken destructive drive. The child can hardly be kept here and should come for treatment as quickly as possible. I beg you, therefore, to take care that I receive sufficient quantities of the preparation ‘modiscop’ from Vienna as soon as possible. Perhaps you could ask Mr. Jekelius to write to me about the administration of this preparation. I would be very grateful to you if you could take care of this matter as quickly as possible because the child is a heavy burden for the nursing personnel of the special department".

Apparently Dr. Pfannmüller felt in need of some encouragement for his activities, because he kept a note of a conversation with the mother of a child by name of Lothar Hübsch. After a conversation during which the mother had expressed her solictude about her child’s comfort, she stated

"I do not know why an injection is not given to such human beings to make them fall asleep. It makes really no sense to spoon-feed them while the healthy ones are being killed at the front. If I knew where I could go to make such arrangements I would do it. If the child were dead I could peacefully die myself, but as it is, I would worry who would take care of him". (Appendix 3, No.20).

The documents include lists of 275 children who passed through the children’s department between 1940 and 1943. "Authorization" was given in 213 of these cases. Sample sets of these lists are reproduced in Appendix 3, Nos. 21, 22, 23, 24 and 25.

Part IV
Part II

Document compiled by Dr S D Stein
Last update 14/03/02 14:36:56
Stuart.Stein@uwe.ac.uk
©S D Stein

Faculty of Economics and Social Science Home Page