. ©MAZAL LIBRARY

NMT07-T0001


. NUERNBERG MILITARY TRIBUNAL
Volume VII · Page 1
Previous Page Home PageArchive
Table of Contents - Volume 7
INTRODUCTION
The trial of 23 officials of the I.G. Farben concern was commonly referred to as the Farben case and is officially designated as United States of America vs. Carl Krauch, et at. (Case 6). The Farben case was the third largest of all the Nuernberg trials, the record being surpassed in length only by the IMT case (Trial of the Major War Criminals, vols. I-XLII, Nuremberg, 1947) and the Ministries case (vols. XII-XIV, this series).

The Farben case was the second of the so-called industrialist cases, the indictment being filed after the indictment in the Flick case (vol. VI, this series) and before the indictment in the Krupp case (vol. IX, this series). Each of these three industrialist cases contained counts alleging spoliation of property in invaded countries and participation in Germany's slave labor program, and under these counts some of the defendants were found guilty in each of these cases. The indictments in both the Farben and the Krupp cases contained counts alleging crimes against peace, and in both cases the Tribunals found all defendants charged to be not guilty under these counts. The Tribunal in the Krupp case made its finding of not guilty at the conclusion of the prosecution's case in chief upon a defense motion, whereas the Farben Tribunal did not make its finding until final judgment. In a trial under Control Council Law No. 10 in the French Zone of Occupation, the German industrialist Hermann Roechling was found guilty of crimes against peace by a military tribunal of international composition, but this conviction was reversed upon appeal to the General Tribunal of the Military Government of the French Zone of Occupation in Germany. (The indictment, judgment, and judgment on appeal in the Roechling case are reproduced as Appendix B, vol. XIV, this series.)

Each of the 23* defendants in the Farben trial was an official of the I.G. Farben concern for varying periods of time: the first-named defendant, Krauch, was a member of Farben's managing board (Vorstand) from 1934 until 1940 and thereafter, until 1945, the chairman of Farben's supervisory board (Aufsichtsrat)
__________
* The Farben indictment named 24 defendants. The case as to defendant Brueggemann was severed early in the trial by reason of Brueggemann's ill health and inability to stand trial with the other defendants, see section XX C, vol. XV, this series.  



1
Next Page NMT Home Page